Image
Author Information
Ansari M*, Parulekar
SV**.
(*Assistant Professor,
** Professor and Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seth GS Medical College & KEM
Hospital , Mumbai , India .)
Abstract
Low grade endometrial
stromal sarcoma is not a very common tumor of the uterus. Clinically it is
mistaken for a leiomyoma of the uterus. Its gross appearance may be suggestive
of its diagnosis. We present a case in which its gross appearance was quite
unusual.
Introduction
Low grade endometrial
stromal sarcoma is often mistaken for a leiomyoma of the uterus on clinical
examination and on inspection of the external surface of the uterus during a
laparotomy. The gross appearance of its cut surface may be suggestive of its
diagnosis. But usually the specimen is not opened during the laparotomy and the
diagnosis may be missed. The diagnosis is usually made after histopathological
examination of the specimen. We present a case in which the gross appearance of
the external surface of the uterus with a low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma
was quite unusual.
Clinical Features
A 44 year old married woman,
para 2 abortion 4, presented with menorrhagia for six months. Her past
menstrual cycles were regular, and the flow was moderate. Her past, medical and
surgical history were not contributory. General and systemic examination
findings were normal, except for moderate anemia. Abdominal and bimanual pelvic
examination showed the uterus was enlarged to 18 weeks’ size, globular, and
with irregular upper surface. A diagnosis of uterine leiomyoma was made. Ultrasonography
showed a well defined 10x8x8.5 cm sized mass with heterogenous echotexture in
the uterine fundus with minimal vascularity, suggestive of a non-pedunculated
leiomyoma. There was another 4.8x3.7x3.5cm sized lesion with similar appearance
in the anterior wall of the uterus. Pap smear and endometrial aspiration
cytology did not show any evidence suggestive of a malignancy. After correction
of her anemia with transfusion of packed red cells and confirming that she was
fit to undergo an operation, an exploratory laparotomy was performed. The
findings are shown in figure 1. An abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy was done. The patient made an uneventful recovery.
Figure 1. The uterus is
enlarged. Three nodules with smooth external surface are seen over the uterine
fundus anteriorly. A large vein is seen between two of these nodules.
Gross examination showed
a uterus measuring 18x9x8 cm, with three small firm sessile masses measuring
3x2x2 cm on the anterior fundal wall. There was a large engorged vein running
across anterior wall in between two of these masses. Cut surface showed
involvement of the entire thickness of the myometrium by the tumor including
the fundal nodules, but the serosa was intact. The mass extended into the
endometrial cavity. Histopathology of the tumor showed tongues and sheets of
neoplastic endometrial stromal cells in the full thickness of the myometrium. The
serosa was intact. The tumor cells were oval shaped with basophilic mildly
atypical nuclei and scanty cytoplasm. There was a prominent delicate arborizing
vasculature throughout the tumor. Whorling of the neoplastic cells was seen
around the arterioles. Two or three mitoses were seen per 10 HPF. There was no
necrosis. A diagnosis of low grade endometrial stromal sarcoma was made.
Discussion
Low grade endometrial
stromal sarcoma is not a very common tumor of the uterus. Clinically it is
mistaken for a leiomyoma of the uterus. Its gross appearance may be suggestive
of its diagnosis. It may be seen as a submucous polyp, or an intramyometrial
mass. The classical gross appearance of an intramyometrial mass is either a
single nodule, multiple solid-cystic masses, or a poorly demarcated
solid-cystic lesion.[1] About 50% cases are well circumscribed. Cut
surface of the uterus shows worm-like masses penetrating the myometrium
diffusely. Extrauterine extension is seen in 30% of cases. The diagnosis is
usually made after histopathological examination.[2,3] Most of the
tumors involve the endometrium too.[4]
Our case was unusual in
that the tumor had grown as nodules on the uterine surface, but the serosa of
these nodules was intact. A large vein between two of these nodules suggested
vascularity, that might be due to underlying malignancy, though surface veins
are known to occur with uterine subserous leiomyomas too.[5] Such an
appearance has not been described in the literature before.
Conclusion
In such cases of unusual
presentation of leiomyoma, one should consider possibility of endometrial
stromal sarcoma, even though endometrial aspiration cytology or histopathology
of curetted material does not show any malignancy.
References
- Pekindil G, Tuncyurek O, Orguc S, Inceboz U, Kandiloglu AR, Caglar H. A case of endometrial stromal sarcoma with curvilinear calcification. Gynecologic Oncology 2005, 98:318-321.
- Mesia AF, Demopoulos I. Effects of leuprolide acetate on low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1140-1141.
- Husseiny GE, Bareedy NA, Mourad WA, Mohamed G, Shoukri M, Subhi J. Prognostic factors and treatment modalities in uterine sarcoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2002, 25:256-260.
- Berkowitz RS, Goldstein DP. Uterine cancer. In Berek JS, Hacker NE, editors. Practical Gynecologic Oncology. 4th ed. Philadelphia Williams & Wilkins; 2005:431-432.
- Mirchandani A, Parulekar SV, Dalvi P. Hemoperitoneum from Ruptured Leiomyoma. JPGO 2014 Volume 1 Number 10. Available from: http://www.jpgo.org/2014/10/hemoperitoneum-from-ruptured-leiomyoma.html
Ansari M, Parulekar SV. Low Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma:
Unusual Gross Appearance. JPGO 2015. Volume 2 No. 4. Available from: http://www.jpgo.org/2015/04/low-grade-endometrial-stromal-sarcoma.html